[Debate] Occupy UN - sic... The Elevation of Jeffrey Feltman

Sat May 26 16:06:04 BST 2012

Yoshie:

Is this a strategy proposal or just a wish?

In so far as the 'left' may consider - wrongly, I think - the UN agencies
as a kinder, gentler form of global domination, I think this might be a
tough one. Even my rather incrementalist proposal for a reform of the
International Labour Organisation, on its 2019 one century anniversary, has
fallen on deaf ears.

Bearing in mind, however, the quite hypocritical attitude of the CEO of the
IMF towards the Greeks - that they are not (yet) in as pitiful a condition
as the poor of Africa - maybe the idea of Occupying its HQ in Washington
would have some traction.

PeterW

On Sat, May 26, 2012 at 3:24 PM, Yoshie Furuhashi <
critical.montages at gmail.com> wrote:

> Till the Left occupies the commanding heights of the UN, its agencies,
> and related organizations, forget about using "international law" for
> the benefit of humanity.
>
> On Sat, May 26, 2012 at 2:59 AM, Riaz K Tayob <riaz.tayob at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > [After a CIA agent took over the MDGs, Ban Ki-moon (the only UN SG to
> > sit in on military planning to bombard Libya) ups the ante.... again..]
> >
> > Weekend Edition May 25-27, 2012
> > Share on facebook Share on twitter Share on google More Sharing Services
> 5
> > “Very Bad News” – Noam Chomsky
> > The Elevation of Jeffrey Feltman
> > by VIJAY PRASHAD
> >
> > A blog visited mainly by UN insiders announces that US Assistant
> > Secretary of State for Near Eastern Affairs Jeffrey Feltman is up for a
> > very important UN job. Former UN Assistant Secretary General for Public
> > Information Samir Sanbar’s blog, UN Forum, notes that UN Secretary
> > General Ban Ki-moon is set to replace B. Lynn Pascoe with Feltman in the
> > post of UN Under-Secretary General for Political Affairs. The office was
> > created in 1992 to help identify and resolve political conflicts around
> > the world. Pascoe ran at least a dozen missions in Africa, Asia and the
> > Middle East, notably in Burundi, Somalia, Iraq, Lebanon and Libya. The
> > longest running mission is in Somalia (since 1995) and the most recent
> > is in Libya (since September 2011). With a budget of $250 million and
> > funds for special political missions that amount, this year, to $1
> > billion, the post allows its leader to intervene in political crises
> > around the world.
> >
> > When Secretary General Ban began his second term in January, he promised
> > to reshuffle some of his senior staff. Pascoe’s replacement is part of
> > this process.
> >
> > Of the proposed new appointment Sanbar writes, “Designating someone with
> > varied field experience, though controversial, and from a substantially
> > senior post, may mean that more issues could be referred to the Security
> > Council.” The UN Security Council’s Secretariat is handled by the
> > Department of Political Affairs, which would be able to have some sway
> > on its agenda. The post is central to the UN bureaucracy.
> >
> > News of Feltman’s resignation from the State Department next week simply
> > confirmed all the rumors. Another rumor suggests that the UN will
> > announce the appointment on Monday, May 28.
> >
> > Is Jeffrey Feltman the best person to run such an influential office in
> > the UN? Why did Sanbar believe that this appointment is “controversial.”
> >
> > Shibley Telhami, the Anwar Sadat Chair for Peace and Development at the
> > University of Maryland and a Senior Fellow at the Brookings Institution,
> > told me that Feltman is “an accomplished and respected American
> > diplomat.” He has been involved in the Arab-Israeli conflict, Iran,
> > Lebanon and Syria, and other hot spots. These bring up “inevitably
> > controversial issues,” Telhami continued. “Feltman would have his share
> > of detractors, including in the Middle East,” he said.
> >
> > But why would Feltman have these “detractors” and how did he come off on
> > the “controversial issues”?
> >
> > On one issue Feltman is remarkably consistent. When it comes to the
> > Middle East, Feltman has been outspoken about the threats posed by Iran
> > in the region. Whether in Beirut or Manama, he has publically denounced
> > Iranian “interference” outside its own boundaries. At the same time,
> > Feltman has generously offered US assistance to these same regimes. In
> > other words, US interference is quite acceptable, but Iranian
> > interference is utterly unacceptable. This might be adequate behavior
> > for the diplomat of a country, but it is hardly the temperament for a
> > senior UN official. It raises doubts about Feltman’s ability to be
> > even-handed in his deliberations as a steward of the world’s political
> > dilemmas.
> >
> > Feltman’s intemperate logic was not of the distant past. It was on
> > display in March 2012 at a Lebanese American Organization’s meeting at
> > the Cannon Office Building in Washington, DC (as Franklin Lamb reported
> > on this site this week). At this meeting, the former US Ambassador to
> > Lebanon, instructed the Lebanese people as to what they must do in their
> > next election, “The Lebanese people must join together to tell Hezbollah
> > and its allies that the Lebanese state will no longer be hijacked for an
> > Iranian-Syrian agenda.” The people must “use the 2013 parliamentary
> > elections to defeat the remnants of the Syrian occupation, the pillar of
> > which is Hezbollah.”
> >
> > Indeed, interference by speeches is not the limit of Feltman’s
> > ambitions. On May 3, 2012, he was back in Beirut, meeting former Prime
> > Minister Fouad Siniora, former Finance Minister Mohamad Chatah, Future
> > Movement leader Nader Hariri and others at Hariri’s residence. In the
> > transcript of their meeting (leaked through Al-Akhbar), an older side of
> > US policy making emerges. US Ambassador to Lebanon Maura Connelly is
> > heard saying that the government is “Hezbollah dominated,” to which
> > Feltman says to the Lebanese politicians in the room, “You can bring
> > down the government if Walid [Jumblatt] is with you in the parliament or
> > if Najib [Mikati, the PM] resigns right?” To Siniora, Feltman says,
> > “Would it help if this government is brought down before the elections,”
> > and then he mentions that he is seeing the Prime Minister Najib Mikati
> > later that evening. “This place is very, very weird,” he notes, “weirder
> > than when I left.” This is not a trivial statement. A glance at
> > Feltman’s cables when he was ambassador to Lebanon reveals a fulsome
> > appetite for the weird. The cables betray an obsession with the social
> > lives of the Lebanese elite, their peccadillos and their foibles.
> >
> > Feltman’s “non-interference” to prevent Iranian “interference” in
> > Lebanon brings to mind another episode in his recent career. When the
> > people’s protest broke out in Bahrain, US Secretary of State Hillary
> > Clinton sent him there at least four, perhaps six, times. He was there
> > on the eve of the Saudi-led invasion into Manama to smash the protests
> > in March 2011. In a visit to Manama on March 3, 2011, just before the
> > crackdown, Feltman praised the King for his “initiatives” and urged him
> > to “include the full spectrum of Bahraini society, without exception.”
> > In the Shia quarters, and amongst the al-Wefaq party activists, this
> > sounded like Feltman was urging the King to take them seriously. In
> > language similar to what he used in Lebanon, Feltman noted that the US
> > wants a “Bahraini process” and urges others “to refrain, as we are, from
> > interference or trying to impose a non-Bahraini solution from outside
> > Bahrain.” The crucial phrase here is as we are, which implies that the
> > US is not intervening in Bahrain. The fact of the 5th Fleet stationed in
> > Manama and of the close cooperation between the Saudi monarch, the
> > Bahraini King and Feltman’s bosses was to be ignored. “We are not
> > naïve,” Feltman said, pointing across the waters at Iran. They cannot be
> > permitted to intervene, but the US, a “critical partner” of the Kingdom,
> > and the Gulf Arab monarchs, “will support Bahrain.”
> >
> > When events heated up in Bahrain, Feltman and the chairman of the Joint
> > Chiefs of Staff Admiral Mike Mullen went on a tour of the emirates’
> > capitals, declaring their unconditional support. The US stands for
> > “universal human rights,” Feltman told the emirs, but of course since
> > “every country is unique” these rights would emerge in their own way.
> > Mullen was at hand to “reassure, discuss and understand what’s going
> > on.” The key word here is reassure.
> >
> > A clear-eyed assessment comes from Karim Makdisi, who teaches at the
> > American University of Beirut. Makdisi recalls Feltman’s role as
> > Ambassador in the area, where he made himself an extremely divisive
> > figure. Feltman pushed for UN Resolution 1559 from 2004, to disarm the
> > Lebanese resistance, he supported the Israeli invasion in 2006, and he
> > provided assistance to the March 14 political party against Hezbollah.
> > In other words, Feltman actively took sides in a divided political
> > landscape. Feltman’s appointment “would be a disaster and send exactly
> > the wrong signal for the UN” to the region. Having recognized its
> > weakness, the US knows that it will be the UN that takes the lead in
> > Syria and elsewhere for the foreseeable future. Makdisi believes that in
> > “anticipating a larger role for the UN,” the US wishes Feltman to be
> > well-placed to “ensure that US interests are maintained as much as
> > possible.” Whatever credibility remains with the UN will whittle in the
> > region with this appointment.
> >
> > It is likely that Secretary General Ban Ki-moon picked Feltman for an
> > unearned reputation. He is known around the Beltway for his work on the
> > Arab Spring. But in the totality of the Arab world Feltman will not be
> > seen as an open-minded professional. He has already thrown his hat into
> > the camp of the Saudis and their satellites (the Gulf Arabs and the
> > Hariri clan of Lebanon). This will limit Feltman’s ability to move an
> > agenda in the region, least of all on the Arab-Israeli conflict where
> > sober diplomacy is necessary from the UN. When I asked several people
> > who watch the UN’s work in the Arab world carefully about this
> > appointment, most offered me three words, “very bad news” (these words
> > are from Noam Chomsky). Not bad news for the Saudis or the US
> > neoconservatives, but certainly bad for the people of the Arab world,
> > whose Spring had them longing not so much for this kind of venal
> > diplomacy but for honesty and good-will.
> >
> > Vijay Prashad’s new book, Arab Spring, Libyan Winter , is published by
> > AK Press.
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Debate-list mailing list
> > Debate-list at fahamu.org
> > http://lists.fahamu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debate-list
>
>
>
> --
> Yoshie Furuhashi
> <http://mrzine.org/>
> _______________________________________________
> Debate-list mailing list
> Debate-list at fahamu.org
> http://lists.fahamu.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debate-list
>

-- 
*1.* Contribute to Journal Special on 'New Worker
Movements<http://www.interfacejournal.net/2011/06/call-for-papers-volume-4-issue-2-for-the-global-emancipation-of-labour-new-movements-and-struggles-around-work-workers-and-precarity/>
'!
*2. Blog:* http://www.unionbook.org/profile/peterwaterman
*3. EBook 2011, 'Under, Against, Beyond - Essays 1980s-
   1990s* s <http://www.into-ebooks.com/book/under-against-beyond/>
http://www.into-ebooks.com/book/under-against-beyond/
*4.* WorkingPaper *2012*: 'Emancipatory Labour
Studies'<http://www.iisg.nl/publications/respap49.pdf>
:
*5.* Draft EBook 2012: 'Recovering Internationalism - Essays 2000-10'
(draft):
     http://www.scribd.com/doc/82125289/ReCovIntComp-A-2
     http://www.scribd.com/doc/82129474/ReCovtIntComp-B-2
*6. *Essay 2012: 'The 2nd Coming of the World Federation of Trade
Unions': <http://www.unionbook.org/profiles/blogs/peter-waterman-the-second-coming-of-the-wftu-updated>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.fahamu.org/pipermail/debate-list/attachments/20120526/30f1436e/attachment-0001.htm 