[Debate] Jordan: Israeli Potato Invasion Revives Resistance to Normalization

Riaz K Tayob riaz.tayob at gmail.com
Tue Jan 24 16:12:41 GMT 2012



Follow Al-Akhbar on Twitter Like Al-Akhbar on Facebook Subscribe to our 
RSS Feed
Jordan: Israeli Potato Invasion Revives Resistance to Normalization
Jordan's King Abdullah II (R) meets with Israeli President Shimon Peres 
at the Royal Palace in Amman on 28 October 2011, during the latter's 
official visit to the neighboring desert kingdom. (Photo: AFP - HO - PETRA)

By: Muhammad Farhan

Published Friday, January 20, 2012

US-led normalization efforts are taking a toll on the Jordanian potato 
farmers as Israeli potatoes have flooded the market, threatening local 
farmers’ livelihoods.

Amman – Jordan is in the middle of an intense debate about why its 
markets were flooded with Israeli potatoes, threatening local products 
from the Ghor region of the Jordan Valley.

A similar debate emerged during the olive harvest season, when the 
amount of exported olives from Jordan to Israel had reached 11,480 tons, 
before they were halted in mid-November.

By then, Israel had received more than 98% of Jordan’s olive exports, 
according to the agriculture ministry.

The new year has brought an unprecedented flood of Israeli potato 
shipments to Jordanian markets. This “invasion” was helped by the 
agriculture ministry’s leniency in giving out import licenses to a large 
number of importers of Israeli products.

By contrast, the same ministry refused to allow a shipment of Gulf 
potatoes to enter Jordan.

Pleas from Jordan Valley farmers have not succeeded in getting the 
agricultural ministry to reverse its decision to normalize trade with 
Israel. The arguments put forward by the farmers are not just political, 
they also rely on purely agricultural data.

They point out that the Israeli potato invasion of Jordanian markets 
coincides with the harvest of local potatoes in the Ghor area. This is 
damaging to local producers, who are forced to lower their prices in 
order to compete with Israeli imports.

This has been confirmed by the director of the Union of Jordan Valley 
Farmers, Adnan Khaddam, who says: “Large amounts of Israeli potatoes 
entering the Jordanian market, when the local harvest is ready, has 
caused our farmers to suffer from severe marketing bottlenecks,” 
particularly when potatoes are the main crop for the majority of 
Jordanian farmers.

Sources from the agriculture ministry revealed that the minister, Ahmad 
al-Khattab, set up an investigation committee to deal with this issue, 
which led to a halt on import licenses granted to a number of merchants.

The farmers say that this action has come too late, now that the Israeli 
potatoes have already been introduced to the market.

This “agricultural invasion” is not the only economic development that 
worries Jordanians who are against normalization.

There is also the phenomenon of “religious tourism,” in which some tour 
operators exploit the emotions of the faithful (both Muslims and 
Christians), to break their resistance to normalization.

People are tempted to visit Islamic and Christian holy places in 
occupied Jerusalem, Hebron, and Nazareth.

This has led the Jordanian Higher Committee to Protect the Homeland and 
Resist Normalization to issue repeated calls and warnings to tourism 
companies and travel agents to “cease to organize such normalizing trips 
under the excuse of religion and tourism.”

In the middle of this debate, on January 6, the Israeli newspaper 
Ma’ariv, revealed that a new phase has begun in the normalization 
process, saying that Jordan has agreed to sign a new Qualifying 
Industrial Zone (QIZ) treaty soon.

This will include a large-scale agreement on trade cooperation with 
Israel under the auspices of the United States.

The QIZ agreements aim to bring Egypt and Jordan closer to Israel by 
exempting Jordanian and Egyptian exports to the US from customs charges, 
on the condition that these products contain Israeli raw materials.

The Israeli newspaper said that the US had expressed its wish to support 
a tripartite agreement between Tel Aviv, Washington, and Amman to 
guarantee “the freedom of commercial cooperation.”

Ma’ariv added that this agreement seeks to lower the price of products 
exchanged between Jordan and Israel by 10%.

This will be done by facilitating the import of raw materials or 
components from the US, manufacturing them in Israel and Jordan, and 
then exempting them from custom charges completely.

It is worth noting that this agreement comes as part of the Commercial 
Cooperation Treaty signed by the Jordanian and Israeli governments in 1998.

This included the construction of 11 joint industrial zones, some in 
Jordan and others in Bisan, a town located in the northern Palestine 
that was occupied in 1948.

Economic analyst, Salama al-Diraawi, believes that the large volume, in 
quantity and quality, of the exports which come from the “economy of 
peace” cities agreed to in the QIZ treaty, have had no positive effects 
on the Jordanian economy.

“The added value these industrial cities have brought to the Jordanian 
national economy has not exceeded 15% at best. This is because these 
factories depend on migrant labor, while enjoying customs exemptions and 
huge advantages. This has removed any tangible content from the 
so-called ‘economy of peace,’” Diraawi said.

The head of the Committee of Jordanian Clothes Exporters, Farhan Afram, 
agreed with this analysis. He pointed out that “the products from the 
factories set up within the framework of the ‘economy of peace’ treaty 
are geared towards export to the US, because of the advantages in the 
free trade treaty. They are therefore not concerned with covering the 
needs of the Jordanian markets.”

As for investment, Afram believes that the presence of Israeli partners 
in these factories seriously limits investment from Jordanian financiers 
because the anti-normalization, professional unions, and opposition 
parties continue to call for their boycott.

This article is an edited translation from the Arabic Edition.




More information about the Debate-list mailing list