[Debate] (Fwd) Wallerstein on world left
lfcscally at hotmail.com
Tue Jan 3 17:16:01 GMT 2012
Hi Riaz, I meant that there is a recognition amongst some supporting the Climate Jobs campaign that economic growth will not answer the climate question and that we can re-train people into climate jobs and so it is not underpinned by the notion that progress = economic growth or that we can only solve the climate question through economic growth. If done right I think such a campaign is also pregnant with the potential to undermine the redistribution through growth (trickle-down economics)
> Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2012 10:35:13 +0200
> From: riaz.tayob at gmail.com
> To: debate-list at fahamu.org
> Subject: Re: [Debate] (Fwd) Wallerstein on world left
> Can you explain/elaborate the sentence below, please.
> On 2012/01/03 10:23 AM, LFC Scally wrote:
> > Linked to the above there are trade union currents/debates that argue
> > that the environmental challenge cannot be solved by developmentalism
> > and this is implicit in the Million Climate Change Jobs in the UK and
> > SA .
> Debate-list mailing list
> Debate-list at fahamu.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Debate-list