[DEBATE] : (Fwd) Zim sanctions debate: defanging the bank that bit Bredenkamp
Patrick Bond
pbond at mail.ngo.za
Wed Apr 1 23:02:38 BST 2009
*Star (SA), 31 March *
* *
* SA man accused of funding Mugabe takes bank to court *
Judge stops institution from closing billionaire's accounts
Baldwin Ndaba
John Bredenkamp, the South African billionaire accused of bankrolling
Zimbabwean President Robert Mugabe, has won an interim order preventing
Standard Bank from closing his bank accounts. In December, Standard Bank
wrote to Bredenkamp, who holds several accounts with them, notifying him
of their decision to close his accounts. The bank's threat to Bredenkamp
followed a decision by the US Department of Treasury's Office of Foreign
Assets Control to list Bredenkamp and his associated entities as
"specially designated nationals" on November 25. This meant Bredenkamp
and his companies became subject to the sanctions imposed and enforced
by the US office. Standard Bank became aware of the listing and that the
US office suspected Bredenkamp of "being involved in illicit business
activities, including tobacco trading, arms trafficking, oil
distribution and diamond extraction, and of being a confidant and
financial backer of Zimbabwe's President Robert Mugabe".
The bank relied on various newspaper reports in a number of countries
between September 1996 and March this year that indicated Bredenkamp's
purported notoriety at the time of the US Office of Foreign Assets
Control listing. In their papers before Johannesburg High Court Judge
Mahomed Jajbhay, Standard Bank argued that it was worried about its
reputation. The bank believed domestic and foreign business partners
"might believe or suspect that accounts held at Standard Bank would or
could be used to facilitate unlawful or unethical acts. "An association
with a conductor (Bredenkamp) or a financier of allegedly illegal or
improper transactions might well undermine a bank's hard-won and fragile
national and international reputation in the eyes of regulatory bodies,
financial institutions, media organisations and members of the public
worldwide," the bank argued.
According to the bank, "in not dissimilar circumstances, other blue chip
financial institutions such as Barclays, Standard Chartered and Old
Mutual had come in for scathing criticism in influential international
publications. In addition to the risk of harm to its reputation,
Standard Bank faced material business risks to its relationship with
foreign banks." Bredenkamp challenged the bank's decision in the high
court, saying he had lodged appeals against the US office to impose
sanctions on him. He also argued that if Standard Bank closed his
accounts, none of the other banks would want to have any dealings with
him. Yesterday was the date set down by Standard Bank to implement its
decision, but Judge Jajbhay granted Bredenkamp an interim order blocking
the bank from closing his accounts. Bredenkamp denied allegations that
he was a Mugabe crony, saying he had been imprisoned by the "Mugabe
regime", which had also taken his Zimbabwean passport, but had won the
case in the local high court.
Judge Jajbhay agreed with Bredenkamp. In his ruling, he said: "A
business entity must, in order to carry out its objects, have one or
more bank accounts. This is not simply because transactions through a
bank are convenient and customary. It is because the banks operate an
interchange system that makes it all but impossible for a person to do
business without operating through a bank." The judge further said the
termination of a bank account for whatever reason created a black mark
against the customer's name. "The effect is drastic, since it makes it
very difficult for the customer to acquire another bank account. A bank
… will naturally want an explanation for why the account was closed and,
in the light of the explanation, will almost certainly refuse to grant
the customer the facilities requested," the judge ruled. He said the
termination by Standard Bank of Bredenkamp's accounts was "oppressive"
because, in the circumstances, Bredenkamp and his companies were unable
to find alternative banking facilities.
More information about the Debate-list
mailing list