[DEBATE] : (Fwd) Endorse Marx please!
Patrick Bond
pbond at mail.ngo.za
Wed Oct 22 14:22:54 BST 2008
Was he right? If you too think 'yebo!', vote here:
http://timesonline.typepad.com/comment/2008/10/has-karl-marx-b.html
<http://timesonline.typepad.com/comment/2008/10/has-karl-marx-b.html>
(If he was right about financial crisis, it's because the predictions
come true again and again)
http://www.marxmail.org/faq/financial_crisis.htm
What are financial panics and crises?
(prepared by Patrick Bond)
A financial crisis typically consummates a period of irrational
speculation, in the wake of monetary/credit expansion during a
structural stagnation (or even decline) in underlying economic growth
rates. Starting with the 1720 South Sea Company bubble, panics occurred
in financial, commodity or property markets in 1763, 1772, 1793, 1797,
1799 and 1810. Such panics reflected relatively immature markets,
underdeveloped institutions, the uneven expansion of financial systems,
the gullibility of investors, and systemic vulnerability to emotion.
Wars and geopolitical conflict were often catalysts. The Bank of England
and City of Amsterdam performed lender-of-last-resort functions.
More disturbingly, the past two centuries of world capitalism were
punctuated by the 1815-48, 1873-96, 1917-48, and 1974-99 episodes of
stagnation, speculation and crashes. Such periodic cycles (or `long
waves') suggest that a crescendo of financial turbulence may contribute
to economic catharsis and renewed capital accumulation (Marx described
`violent eruptions... forcible solutions of the existing contradictions
which for a time restore the disturbed equilibrium'). Yet discrete
crashes are sometimes insufficient to restore conditions for recovery,
generating instead `payment-freeze' which in turn makes commerce or
investment very difficult to finance in subsequent years. (Thus the past
three cycles were interrupted by severe financial panics--1873, 1882,
1890, 1893; 1920, 1929, 1931; and various 1980s-90s crises--which did
not immediately rejuvenate growth.)
Even where recovery follows, the panics cause enormous financial, social
and ecological harm, often to firms, workers or entire societies which
were innocent of speculation. Concedes contemporary speculator George
Soros, financial markets `move in a herd-like fashion in both
directions. The excess always begins with overexpansion, and the
correction is always associated with pain'. Given the late 1990s role of
the Bretton Woods Institutions and New York Federal Reserve in baling
out emerging-market investors, the asymmetric liability (or 'moral
hazard') for the enormous costs associated with financial panic was one
important reason for the challenge to `Washington Consensus' economic
policy, by even World Bank economist Joseph Stiglitz.
The most recent speculative bubbles and panics--to some extent offset by
limited bailouts, but generally destroying a third or more of the value
of financial assets--included the dollar crash (1970s), gold and silver
turbulence (1970s-80s), Third World debt crisis (1980s), farmland
collapse (1980s), energy finance shocks (mid 1980s), crashes of
international stock (1987) and property (1991-93) markets, and the long
fall (from 1973- 99) in non-petroleum commodity prices and related
securities. Emerging markets offered spectacular late 1990s examples of
financial panic, including Mexico (early 1995), South Africa (early 1996
and mid-1998), Southeast Asia (1997-98), South Korea (early 1998),
Russia (periodic but especially mid- 1998) and Brazil and Ecuador (early
1999). Other examples of investment gambles gone sour included
derivatives speculation, exotic stock market positions, and bad bets on
currency, commodity and interest rate options, futures and swaps, with
specific victims covering enormous losses: Long-Term Capital Management
($3.5 billion)(1998), Sumitomo/London Metal Exchange (1.6 billion
pounds)(1996), I.G.Metallgessellschaft ($2.2 billion)(1994), Kashima Oil
($1.57 billion)(1994), Orange County, California ($1.5 billion)(1994),
Barings Bank ((900 million pounds)(1995), the Belgian government ($1
billion)(1997), and Union Bank of Switzerland ($690 million)(1998).
More information about the Debate-list
mailing list