[DEBATE] : US NGOs Call on Congress to Require Changes in IMF Policies Before Any Gold Sale

MFleshman at aol.com MFleshman at aol.com
Thu Jun 12 13:47:27 BST 2008


 
What am I missing  here? I thought the idea was to shut the IMF down 
US NGOs Call on  Congress to Require Changes in IMF Policies Before Any Gold  
Sales 
US-based civil society groups are  taking advantage of the most significant 
opportunity in at least a decade -- and  for the foreseeable future -- to 
advocate for meaningful policy change at the  International Monetary Fund (IMF). 
This is a historic moment to work for an end  to harmful policies supported by 
the IMF that prevent countries from scaling up  investments in health and 
education.  As middle-income countries have been  paying off old loans and not 
taking out any new loans in order to avoid the  negative consequences of its loan 
conditions, the IMF has been plunged into a  financial crisis. Currently, the 
IMF is proposing to sell some of the gold stock  it holds to create a trust 
fund, proceeds of which would be used to pay for the  IMF's administrative 
expenses. However, selling this gold requires authorization  by United States 
Congress, providing a unique point of leverage for civil  society organizations in 
the US. 
In the recent letter to the US  congress (pasted below), US NGOs are now 
calling on Congress to only approve  such gold sales if Congress first obtains 
policy changes in the IMF’s loan  conditions. At this stage, many Members of 
Congress are focused on getting  assurances from the IMF that it will address 
other issues, such as transparency  of so-called 'sovereign wealth funds' and the 
valuation of China's currency. But  many US NGOs feel it that it is vital that 
people in the United States  urge Congress to press for changes in the area 
where the IMF policy-making role  is by far the most significant: the policies 
it continues to impose on poor  countries. Links to background materials on 
these matters follow the sign-on  letter below. 
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------- 
Dear Senators and  Representatives, 
Re: U.S.  Civil society letter to Members of U.S. Congress on IMF gold sales 
and scaling  up investments in health and education 
The International Monetary Fund  (IMF) is seeking authorization from U.S. 
Congress to sell some of its gold  reserves for the purpose of funding the 
institution’s future operations. The  Bush administration has tentatively indicated 
its support for IMF gold sales. We  are writing to urge that before 
authorizing gold sales, Congress insist on  meaningful reforms in IMF policy in 
developing countries and attach conditions  to how gold sales will occur. 
Over the last three decades, IMF  policies have limited development 
opportunities, and denied opportunity and  decent livelihoods to hundreds of millions. 
Instead, the IMF has leveraged its  role as gatekeeper to international 
capital flows to insist that poor countries  adopt a narrow set of policies that 
have limited possibilities for more  expansionary economic growth and prevented 
developing country governments from  investing sufficiently in healthcare, 
education and other vital  needs. 
As proposed, sale of IMF gold would  be a one-time event, with the proceeds 
used solely for funding of IMF operations  and done in such a manner as to 
likely preclude any future Congressional  leverage over Fund activities, and 
without any assurances or even promises of  changes to long-standing failed and 
harmful IMF  policies. 
If Congress is to authorize IMF gold  sales, it should take advantage of the 
opportunity to remedy these historic  wrongs. Before Congress approves IMF 
gold sales, it must ensure that proceeds  are not used exclusively for 
maintaining IMF staff. The gold held by the IMF is  in essence a global public good. 
If gold sales are to be approved, a  significant portion of the proceeds 
should therefore be devoted to the public  good of alleviating global poverty. The 
best way to do this would be to allocate  proceeds towards debt cancellation. 
Proceeds could be placed into a trust that  could be used to cover protracted 
arrears of countries soon to be eligible for  debt cancellation under the 
existing IMF/World Bank debt relief programs, or to  fund future debt 
cancellation for additional impoverished  countries. 
Congress should also condition its  authorization of gold sales on whether or 
not the IMF achieves the following  specific and demonstrable changes in its 
policy mandates and prescriptions for  developing countries: 
• The IMF must rescind the use of  overly restrictive deficit-reduction and 
inflation-reduction targets. Such  targets prevent developing countries from 
growing their economies and expanding  public spending, including in the 
critical areas of health and education. The  IMF must not stand in the way of policy 
makers in borrowing countries exploring  and adopting more expansionary fiscal 
and monetary policy  options. 
• Expanded health and education  spending must be exempt from budget 
ceilings. Budget and wage bill ceilings can  undermine impoverished countries’ ability 
to provide adequate salaries for  health and education workers, hire 
additional needed health workers and teachers  and scale up and improve the quality of 
the health and education sectors. The  IMF has made some moves toward 
eliminating wage bill ceilings, but maintains  budget caps that limit overall 
government spending flexibility. Expanded  spending in the crucial areas of health 
and education must not be subjected to  these overall budget caps. 
• Developing countries must be  permitted to spend foreign aid for its 
intended purposes. The IMF's own  Independent Evaluation Office (IEO) finds as much 
as 74% of additional foreign  aid to 29 countries in sub-Saharan Africa  
between 1999-2005 has been diverted from its intended purposes. Instead of being  
spent on health, HIV/AIDS, and education, it has been allocated to domestic 
debt  payment and international currency reserves because of IMF policies 
regulating  monetary policies. While we understand that the establishment of strong 
reserves  can be a priority for a country, the decision of whether to use 
foreign aid to  build up reserves should be the government’s, made after public 
discussion of  the implications with civil society, the legislature, and other 
stakeholders,  with a clear analysis of the trade-offs involved. 
• Debt cancellation must be  de-linked from harmful economic policy 
conditions, including overly restrictive  deficit-reduction and inflation-reduction 
targets, wage and budget caps that  limit spending on health and education; 
policies that lead to diversion of  foreign aid from its intended purposes. 
• Transparency and the right to  access information must be strengthened at 
the IMF. Disclosure of IMF draft  policy papers, technical assistance reports, 
and Executive Board documents—such  as the minutes on Board meetings—is 
imperative to facilitating informed  participation by external stakeholders in 
national economic decision-making and  to ensuring citizens’ ability to hold their 
governments  accountable. 
• Too often, poor borrower  countries’ macroeconomic policies are 
established through secretive  deliberations by the IMF, and the Central Bank and the 
Ministry of Finance. IMF  practices must change to restore national, democratic 
decision-making over  policy-making. IMF Mission Teams that visit countries to 
review loan agreements  or conduct annual surveillance (Article IV reports) 
must participate in explicit  and open consultations with a wide range of 
external stakeholders, not just with  the Ministry of Finance and the Central Bank. 
Stakeholders should include other  relevant government ministries (including 
health and education), independent  economists and academic specialists, 
national civil society and labor unions.  These broad and meaningful consultations 
should occur before a country’s  macroeconomic policies are set. 
Finally, we note that the IMF’s gold  sales proposal suggests there would be 
no subsequent sale of gold, and that the  proceeds from this sale would enable 
the Fund to be self-financing. Both of  these matters require careful 
Congressional review. 
Given skyrocketing costs for oil,  redressing developing country debt 
problems and meeting Millennium Development  Goal (MDG) objectives may require new 
sources of funding in the future. There is  no reason to preemptively commit to 
not deploying the global public good of IMF  gold for this purpose in the 
future. 
One consequence of the IMF becoming  self-financing is that Congress would no 
longer have meaningful leverage over  its policies. Given the Fund's record, 
and the importance of Congressional  intervention to advance development 
objectives in the past, we believe this  arrangement merits, at least, very careful 
review before it is put into  place. 
Sincerely, 
ACT UP New  York 
ACT UP Philadelphia 
ActionAid  International USA 
AFL-CIO 
Africa  Action 
Africa Faith and  Justice Network 
African Services  Committee 
AIDS Project  Los  Angeles 
American Friends  Service Committee 
American Jewish  World Service 
American Medical  Student Association (AMSA) 
American Public  Health Association, International Health  Section 
Americans for  Informed Democracy 
Artists for a New  South  Africa 
Bank Information Center 
Center of  Concern   
Columban Justice,  Peace and Integrity of Creation Office (USA) 
Community  HIV/AIDS Mobilization Project (CHAMP) 
Dominican Sisters  of Hope 
East Timor and  Indonesia Action Network  (ETAN) 
Essential  Action 
50 Years is  Enough: U.S. Network for Global Economic  Justice 
Foreign Policy in  Focus 
Gender  Action 
Global AIDS  Alliance 
Global Action for  Children 
Global  Exchange 
Global Youth  Coalition on HIV/AIDS (GYCA) 
Haiti Reborn/Quixote  Center 
Harm Reduction  Coalition 
Health Alliance  International 
Health GAP  (Global Access Project) 
HIVictorious,  Inc. 
Holy Cross  International Justice Office  
Institute for  Policy Studies, Global Economy Project 
International  Accountability Project 
International  Labor Rights Forum 
InterReligious  Task Force on Central  America 
Jubilee  Montana  Network 
Jubilee Northwest  Coalition 
Jubilee  Oregon 
Jubilee San  Diego 
Jubilee USA  Network 
Jubilee  Virginia 
L.A. Gay &  Lesbian Center 
Leadership  Conference of Women Religious 
Maryknoll Global  Concerns 
Mennonite Central  Committee U.S., Washington  Office 
Mercy Investment  Program 
Missionary  Oblates of Mary Immaculate, Justice Peace/Integrity of Creation  
Office 
National Women’s  Health Network 
Nicaragua Center for Community  Action (NICCA) 
Nicaragua  Network 
North to South  Aid 
Northwest  International Health Action Coalition (NIHAC) 
The ONE Campaign  (Make Poverty History) 
Oxfam America 
Partners in  Health  
People's Health  Movement 
Physicians for  Human Rights 
RESULTS,  USA 
San  Francisco Bay  Area Jubilee Coalition 
School Sisters of  Notre Dame – Global Justice & Peace Commission   
School Sisters of  Notre Dame – Milwaukee Provincial  Council 
Service Employees  International Union  (SEIU) 
Sisters of Mercy  Regional Community of Detroit 
Sisters of the  Holy Cross, Congregation Justice Committee 
Sojourners-Call  to Renewal 
Stop HIV/AIDS in  India Initiative  (SHAII) 
Student Campaign  for Child Survival (SCCS) 
Student Global  AIDS Campaign (SGAC) 
Student Trade  Justice Campaign (STJC) 
TransAfrica  Forum 
Treatment Action  Group (TAG) 
Unitarian  Universalist Association of Congregations 
United Methodist Church, General Board of Church and  Society 
Ursuline Sisters  of Tildonk-U.S.  Province 
Vermont Global Health  Coalition 
WingSpan  International USA 
Witness for  Peace 
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------ 
NOTE: For background information on  these issues, see: 
Jubilee USA Network, "Recent  Developments On IMF Gold Sales & Debt 
Cancellation," February 2008, 
_http://www.jubileeusa.org/fileadmin/user_upload/Resources/Policy_Archive/208briefnoteimfgold.pdf_ 
(http://www.jubileeusa.org/fileadmin/user_upload/Resources/Policy_Archive/208briefnoteimfgold.pdf)    
Action Aid International, “Overview:  Changing IMF Policies to Get More 
Doctors, Nurses and Teachers Hired in  Developing Countries,” March 2008. 
_http://www.actionaidusa.org/assets/pdfs/imf_project/IMF_and_health.pdf_ 
(http://www.actionaidusa.org/assets/pdfs/imf_project/IMF_and_health.pdf)    
Action Aid International,  "Confronting the Contradictions: The IMF, wage 
bill caps and the case for  teachers," April 2007,  
_http://www.actionaid.org/assets/pdf%5C1%20%20CONFRONTING%20THE%20CONTRADICTIO
NS%20E-VERSION.pdf_ 
(http://www.actionaid.org/assets/pdf\1%20%20CONFRONTING%20THE%20CONTRADICTIONS%20E-VERSION.pdf)    
Action Aid International, "Changing  Course: Alternative Approaches to 
Achieve the Millennium Development Goals and  Fight HIV/AIDS,” November 2005, 
_http://www.actionaid.org.uk/doc_lib/131_1_changing_course.pdf_ 
(http://www.actionaid.org.uk/doc_lib/131_1_changing_course.pdf)    
RESULTS Educational Fund, "The  Budget Ceiling: Why Countries Can’t 
Adequately Invest in Health Care and  Education," updated May10, 2006,  
_http://www.results.org/website/article.asp?id=2208_ 
(http://www.results.org/website/article.asp?id=2208)    
RESULTS Educational Fund, ActionAid  International USA, Global AIDS Alliance, 
Student Global AIDS Campaign, and,  "Blocking Progress: How the Fight Against 
HIV/AIDS is Being Undermined by the  World Bank and International Monetary 
Fund," September 2004, 
_http://www.actionaid.org/docs/77_1_blocking_progress.pdf_ (http://www.actionaid.org/docs/77_1_blocking_progress.pdf)    
Center for Global Development (CGD),  "Does the IMF Constrain Health Spending 
in Poor Countries? Evidence and an  Agenda For Action," July 2007, 
_www.cgdev.org/content/publications/detail/14103_ 
(http://www.cgdev.org/content/publications/detail/14103)    
Gerald Epstein, "Too much, too soon:  IMF conditionality and inflation 
targeting," Bretton Woods Project Update,  September 2006, 
_http://www.brettonwoodsproject.org/art-542599_ (http://www.brettonwoodsproject.org/art-542599)    
European Network on Debt and  Development (Eurodad), "World Bank and IMF 
conditionality: a development  injustice," June, 2006, 
_www.eurodad.org/aid/report.aspx?id=130&item=0454_ 
(http://www.eurodad.org/aid/report.aspx?id=130&item=0454)    
Global Transparency Initiative,  "Transparency at the IMF: A guide for civil 
society on getting access to  information from the IMF," October 2007, 
_www.ifitransparency.org/doc/Transparency_IMF_GTI.pdf_ 
(http://www.ifitransparency.org/doc/Transparency_IMF_GTI.pdf)    
Independent Evaluation Office (IEO)  of the IMF, "An Evaluation of The IMF 
and Aid to Sub-Saharan Africa," 2007,  
_http://www.ieo-imf.org/eval/complete/eval_03122007.html_ 
(http://www.ieo-imf.org/eval/complete/eval_03122007.html)    
United Nations Development Program  (UNDP), "Pro-Growth Alternatives for 
Monetary and Financial Policies in  Sub-Saharan Africa," Policy Research Brief  
No.5, January 2008,  
_www.undp-povertycentre.org/pub/IPCPolicyResearchBrief6.pdf_ 
(http://www.undp-povertycentre.org/pub/IPCPolicyResearchBrief6.pdf)   



**************Vote for your city's best dining and nightlife. City's Best 
2008.      (http://citysbest.aol.com?ncid=aolacg00050000000102)



More information about the Debate-list mailing list