[DEBATE] : (Fwd) Bono the huckster (cont.)
pbond at mail.ngo.za
Tue Mar 6 16:53:23 GMT 2007
Costly Red Campaign Reaps Meager $18 Million
Bono & Co. Spend up to $100 Million on Marketing, Incur Watchdogs' Wrath
By Mya Frazier
COLUMBUS, Ohio (AdAge.com) -- It's been a year since the first Red T-
shirts hit Gap shelves in London, and a parade of celebrity-splashed
The collective marketing outlay by Gap, Apple and Motorola for the Red
campaign has been enormous, with some estimates as high as $100 million.
Just $18 million
Try again: The tally raised worldwide is $18 million.
The disproportionate ratio between the marketing outlay and the money
raised is drawing concern among nonprofit watchdogs, cause-marketing
experts and even executives in the ad business. It threatens to spur a
backlash, not just against the Red campaign -- which ambitiously set
out to change the cause-marketing model by allowing partners to profit
from charity -- but also for the brands involved.
By any measure, the buzz has been extraordinary and the collective
marketing outlay by Gap, Apple and Motorola has been enormous, with
some estimates as high as $100 million. Gap alone spent $7.8 million of
its $58 million outlay on Red during last year's fourth quarter,
according to Nielsen Media Research's Nielsen Adviews.
But contributions don't seem to be living up to the hype. Richard
Feachem, executive director of the Global Fund to Fight AIDS,
Tuberculosis and Malaria, the recipient of money raised by Red, told
The Boston Globe in December, "We may be over the $100 million mark by
the end of Christmas."
Rajesh Anandan, the Global Fund's head of private-sector partnerships,
said Mr. Feachem was misquoted, and defended the efforts by Red to
increase the Global Fund's private-sector donations, which totaled just
$5 million from 2002 to 2005. (The U.S. Congress just approved a $724
million pledge to the Global Fund, on top of $1.9 billion already given
and $650 million from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.)
"Red has done as much as we could have hoped for in the short time it
has been up and running," he said, adding: "The launch cost of this
kind of campaign is going to be hugely frontloaded. It's a very costly
Julie Cordua, VP-marketing at Red and a former Motorola marketing exec
and director-buzz marketing at Helio, said the outlay by the program's
partners must be understood within the context of the campaign's goal:
sustainability. "It's not a charity program of them writing a one-time
check. It has to make good business sense for the company so the money
will continue to flow to the Global Fund over time." She added that
since many of Red's partners haven't closed their books yet on 2006,
more funds likely will be added to the $18 million.
But is the rise of philanthropic fashionistas decked out in Red T-
shirts and iPods really the best way to save a child dying of AIDS in
Parody mocks Bono
The campaign's inherent appeal to conspicuous consumption has spurred a
parody by a group of San Francisco designers and artists, who take
issue with Bono's rallying cry. "Shopping is not a solution. Buy less.
Give more," is the message at buylesscrap.org, which encourages people
to give directly to the Global Fund.
"The Red campaign proposes consumption as the cure to the world's
evils," said Ben Davis, creative director at Word Pictures Ideas, co-
creator of the site. "Can't we just focus on the real solution --
Trent Stamp, president of Charity Navigator, which rates the spending
practices of 5,000 nonprofits, said he's concerned about the campaign's
impact on the next generation. "The Red campaign can be a good start or
it can be a colossal waste of money, and it all depends on whether this
edgy, innovative campaign inspires young people to be better citizens
or just gives them an excuse to feel good about themselves while they
buy an overpriced item they don't really need."
Fears of nonprofits
Mark Rosenman, a longtime activist in the nonprofit sector and a
public-service professor at the Union Institute & University in
Cincinnati, said the disparity between the marketing outlay and the
money raised by Red is illustrative of some of the biggest fears of
nonprofits in the U.S.
"There is a broadening concern that business is taking on the patina of
philanthropy and crowding out philanthropic activity and even
substituting for it," he said. "It benefits the for-profit partners
much more than the charitable causes."
More information about the Debate-list